that the credit markets are close to deconstructing again. Not sure if they mean anything. But two salient factoids are being systemically forced down the throats of those who trade:
1. The U.S. housing market is continuing to deteriorate, and the deterioration, so far, has no end point.
2. The financial services sector, and the debt instruments generated over the last decade, cannot survive point 1, and so it, its equity and its contractual obligations are valueless.
Given enough time, which it has had, the federal government can step in to sponsor a utility-like financial services sector that will meet the needs of the general economy (point 1), but the consequences of point 2, over the intermediate to long term, are quite opaque.
Vive l'opaquace!
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Confirmation Bias
'Confirmation bias' is a term to describe the tendency of the human mind, once a conclusion has been drawn, to emphasize subsequently received information that supports the decision or conclusion and to diminish, distinguish or otherwise minimize the significance of information which contradicts, undermines or otherwise calls it into question.
The current reporting of the trends on residential housing prices offers countless examples of confirmation bias in action. The operative conclusion/decision is the conviction which has prevailed for the last several generations in the United States that house prices always go up, that your home is your best investment, etc. The date coming in recently, to put it mildly, calls that conventional wisdom into question.
All of that data is bad for homeowners, homebuilders, anyone in the real estate business. Some of it is less bad that others. But none of it is exactly positive. However, it is possible to draw some second-order inferences that are non-negative. If the rate of new home construction has falled below the absorption rate for new home inventory and below the rate of household formation, that implies that eventually the situation should turn around. If interest rates are being held at artificially low levels to make mortgages less expensive, that results in an affordability index that would support increased levels of home ownership (if only the sidelined new home owners weren't scared to death of losing their shirts of 'the biggest purchase you'll ever make").
But, even though all the data is bad, the talking heads find someone willing to say something neutral, and the headline writers twist those words into something positive. I really don't think this is the machinations of the National Association of Realtors or the Homebuilders at work. I think it's confirmation bias in action.
Which would suggest that we have a ways to go before it's purged.
The current reporting of the trends on residential housing prices offers countless examples of confirmation bias in action. The operative conclusion/decision is the conviction which has prevailed for the last several generations in the United States that house prices always go up, that your home is your best investment, etc. The date coming in recently, to put it mildly, calls that conventional wisdom into question.
All of that data is bad for homeowners, homebuilders, anyone in the real estate business. Some of it is less bad that others. But none of it is exactly positive. However, it is possible to draw some second-order inferences that are non-negative. If the rate of new home construction has falled below the absorption rate for new home inventory and below the rate of household formation, that implies that eventually the situation should turn around. If interest rates are being held at artificially low levels to make mortgages less expensive, that results in an affordability index that would support increased levels of home ownership (if only the sidelined new home owners weren't scared to death of losing their shirts of 'the biggest purchase you'll ever make").
But, even though all the data is bad, the talking heads find someone willing to say something neutral, and the headline writers twist those words into something positive. I really don't think this is the machinations of the National Association of Realtors or the Homebuilders at work. I think it's confirmation bias in action.
Which would suggest that we have a ways to go before it's purged.
Sunday, May 24, 2009
The Bush Legacy, Memorial Day 2009
Ever notice how in the last year of the second term of a presidency voices are raised in speculation about the hallowed legacy that the incumbent soon to be departed will leave behind? The fund raising machine is cranked up one last time for the benefit of an ever more grandiosie presidential library and respectful columns written about His concern for His legacy dominating His remaining waking hours of Power.
Well, it's Memorial Day Weekend, time to consider legacies and such, even if we haven't heard too much about the Bush legacy recently. Dick Cheny is out there defending torture, the invasion of Iraq and various other crimes and mistakes, to what purpose I know not. But as to the legacy, all is quiet on that front (apologies to Erich Maria Remarque, another good Memorial Day read, in any country, though he wrote as a German after the Great War).
Perhaps there won't be one. Perhaps we will simply roll it all back to 2000. I think that right now if you gave people that choice, without much thought, they'd grab it. In retrospect, most of the 'productivity' gains of the last eight years resulted from 'innovations' in the financial services sector, and just about everyone would like to pretend like that never happened. So, take her back to 2000, skipper.
Well, there is a little problem with that. If you take house prices back to 2000 (not that far really), house prices have to fall roughly another 30% (nation-wide, based on the Case Shiller index, peak to trough), or as far again as they've already fallen (a bit worse that the more adverse scenario of the recently completed stress test exercise). Awful, but in the ballpark of people's tolerable reality dosage. The real horror would be in taking levels of economic activity back to that level. If you reverse 8 years of 2.2% annual economic growth, you drop the standard of living by some 15-16%. That is not quite a Depression Era level of readjustment, but it's far worse than anything since World War II in the United States.
That prospect exceeds the dosage of any tolerable reality check. But, it's a distinct possiblity, if not already baked in. Kinda leaves a guy wondering where the recent stock market rally came from (not that I'm betting against it continuing).
Of course, the Clinton Legacy was Bush, so maybe the Dems better keep quiet. To borrow the title, itself borrowed, of course, of Dean Acheson's memoirs, Messrs. Geithner and Summers, at least, were Present at the Creation of the current economic mess, even if Phil Gramm played the role of Gilgamesh.
Well, it's Memorial Day Weekend, time to consider legacies and such, even if we haven't heard too much about the Bush legacy recently. Dick Cheny is out there defending torture, the invasion of Iraq and various other crimes and mistakes, to what purpose I know not. But as to the legacy, all is quiet on that front (apologies to Erich Maria Remarque, another good Memorial Day read, in any country, though he wrote as a German after the Great War).
Perhaps there won't be one. Perhaps we will simply roll it all back to 2000. I think that right now if you gave people that choice, without much thought, they'd grab it. In retrospect, most of the 'productivity' gains of the last eight years resulted from 'innovations' in the financial services sector, and just about everyone would like to pretend like that never happened. So, take her back to 2000, skipper.
Well, there is a little problem with that. If you take house prices back to 2000 (not that far really), house prices have to fall roughly another 30% (nation-wide, based on the Case Shiller index, peak to trough), or as far again as they've already fallen (a bit worse that the more adverse scenario of the recently completed stress test exercise). Awful, but in the ballpark of people's tolerable reality dosage. The real horror would be in taking levels of economic activity back to that level. If you reverse 8 years of 2.2% annual economic growth, you drop the standard of living by some 15-16%. That is not quite a Depression Era level of readjustment, but it's far worse than anything since World War II in the United States.
That prospect exceeds the dosage of any tolerable reality check. But, it's a distinct possiblity, if not already baked in. Kinda leaves a guy wondering where the recent stock market rally came from (not that I'm betting against it continuing).
Of course, the Clinton Legacy was Bush, so maybe the Dems better keep quiet. To borrow the title, itself borrowed, of course, of Dean Acheson's memoirs, Messrs. Geithner and Summers, at least, were Present at the Creation of the current economic mess, even if Phil Gramm played the role of Gilgamesh.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
